%e1%83%90%e1%83%9b%e1%83%94%e1%83%a0%e1%83%98%e1%83%99%e1%83%98%e1%83%a1%2c%e1%83%a1%e1%83%90%e1%83%94%e1%83%9a%e1%83%a9%e1%83%9d%2c%e1%83%9c%e1%83%98%e1%83%99%e1%83%90%2c%e1%83%92%e1%83%95%e1%83%90%e1%83%a0%e1%83%90%e1%83%9b%e1%83%98%e1%83%90%e1%83%a1%2c% -

: Following court rulings that upheld Gvaramia’s sentence, the U.S. Embassy in Georgia noted that the case "calls into question Georgia's commitment to rule of law".

: The Embassy described a "disturbing pattern of selective investigations and prosecutions" targeting opposition figures, stating that even the perception of such bias is detrimental to democracy. : Following court rulings that upheld Gvaramia’s sentence,

The U.S. Embassy has maintained that the legal proceedings against Nika Gvaramia undermined public confidence in Georgia's rule of law and judicial independence. Key points from their official statements include: Case Background and Imprisonment

: The case led to public friction. Judge Lasha Chkhikvadze, who sentenced Gvaramia, was reportedly disenrolled from a U.S. Embassy-funded exchange program. The Embassy maintained that its support for the judiciary remains "non-partisan and apolitical". Case Background and Imprisonment Judge Lasha Chkhikvadze